• Welcome, Guest! We hope you enjoy the excellent technical knowledge, event information and discussions that the BMW MOA forum provides. Some forum content will be hidden from you if you remain logged out. If you want to view all content, please click the 'Log in' button above and enter your BMW MOA username and password.

    If you are not an MOA member, why not take the time to join the club, so you can enjoy posting on the forum, the BMW Owners News magazine, and all of the discounts and benefits the BMW MOA offers?

  • Beginning April 1st, and running through April 30th, there is a new 2024 BMW MOA Election discussion area within The Club section of the forum. Within this forum area is also a sticky post that provides the ground rules for participating in the Election forum area. Also, the candidates statements are provided. Please read before joining the conversation, because the rules are very specific to maintain civility.

    The Election forum is here: Election Forum

Oil change question...

DENKAR55

New member
Regarding my 2015 R1200 GS Adventure. I want to do all my oil changes. I understand my changing of the engine oil and final drive oil (drive shaft oil)... my question is, I see no information on gear oil change? Is the final drive oil change connected as one to the gears. So changing the final drive oil is also changing the gear oil. I am confused. There is nothing in the yearly schedule maintenance that actually says gear oil change, only final drive. Any information would be greatly appreciated.
 
Regarding my 2015 R1200 GS Adventure. I want to do all my oil changes. I understand my changing of the engine oil and final drive oil (drive shaft oil)... my question is, I see no information on gear oil change? Is the final drive oil change connected as one to the gears. So changing the final drive oil is also changing the gear oil. I am confused. There is nothing in the yearly schedule maintenance that actually says gear oil change, only final drive. Any information would be greatly appreciated.

The engine and transmission are all in one unit. The transmission gears are lubricated with engine oil.
 
That makes sense. I thank you for your answer. Now I can move on with the maintenance schedule. Thank you again!!
 
If you are used to older BMW boxers, the confusion is understandable - it's a change they made in switching to liquid cooling. The liquid cooling keeps the oil temp low enough that they can also use it for the gearbox and wet clutch without adverse affects on the life of the oil and/or gearbox.
 
If you are used to older BMW boxers, the confusion is understandable - it's a change they made in switching to liquid cooling. The liquid cooling keeps the oil temp low enough that they can also use it for the gearbox and wet clutch without adverse affects on the life of the oil and/or gearbox.

Huh? Bikes have been sharing engine and transmission oil for decades in air cooled engines.

I don't think that the decision had anything at all to do with cooling. It was a decision to go with a wet clutch and share the oil like the vast majority of other bikes.
 
Huh? Bikes have been sharing engine and transmission oil for decades in air cooled engines.

I don't think that the decision had anything at all to do with cooling. It was a decision to go with a wet clutch and share the oil like the vast majority of other bikes.

Not with 6000 mile oil change intervals.
 
Not with 6000 mile oil change intervals.
Running cooler does extend oil life but that's true whether or not the oil is also serving the transmission and wet clutch. Liquid cooling did not enable oil sharing between engine, transmission and clutch.

Sent from my SM-T813 using Tapatalk
 
BMW choose a unified crankcase / transmission design for one reason. Its cheaper to build and assemble. I am certain they did not select which oils to use, then design the engine and transmission afterwards.
In the end it always comes down the $$$$ savings.
 
BMW choose a unified crankcase / transmission design for one reason. Its cheaper to build and assemble. I am certain they did not select which oils to use, then design the engine and transmission afterwards.
In the end it always comes down the $$$$ savings.

Its also much easier to replace the clutch. With the old design, this wear item required the bike to be split in half to replace it.
 
Its also much easier to replace the clutch. With the old design, this wear item required the bike to be split in half to replace it.

Not necessarily an improvement. Looks to me that they just moved the splitting bike issue to the alternator...
 
Not necessarily an improvement. Looks to me that they just moved the splitting bike issue to the alternator...

They did, but the alternator is not nearly as much of a "wear item" as a clutch is. Also the voltage regulator is external now and can be replaced without taking the bike apart.

Personally, I prefer the wethead design.
 
They did, but the alternator is not nearly as much of a "wear item" as a clutch is. Also the voltage regulator is external now and can be replaced without taking the bike apart.

Personally, I prefer the wethead design.

Except when it comes to removing the tupperware. A lot more pieces and different screws, grommets,tabs etc ��

FD oil change is so much easier than on my previous Hexhead though
 
Except when it comes to removing the tupperware. A lot more pieces and different screws, grommets,tabs etc ��

FD oil change is so much easier than on my previous Hexhead though

Yep ... it seems they make some things easier and some more difficult .... like the air filter!
 
Yep ... it seems they make some things easier and some more difficult .... like the air filter!

Sometimes I wonder if the engineers have meetings with the mechanics to figure out a way to arrange things so the shop will be able to charge the maximum amount for labor when you bring your bike in for service...
 
Back
Top