hcmiller52
New member
While I know a typical response to my comments here will include "to each his own," I am posting to discuss my opinion about the new K1200GT, in contrast to the "old" K1200GT/RS.
After owning an R1100RT and an R1150GS Adv., I bought a gorgeous '98 K12RS a few months ago from Max BMW (NY). I fell in love with the ride, the power and the handling immediately. The bike's character is a sharp contrast to the R bikes'. Nothing wrong with the Rs, mind you, I still adore my R1150GS and use it for most of my riding, in fact, but the K bike offers something different, perhaps more visceral. The RT left me a bit cold, however, because it was a bit too "fuddy-duddy" or old-mannish for my tastes and seemed a bit too close to the GoldWing end of the spectrum, rather than the sportbike side. The old KRS/GT is clearly closer to the sportbike side. Really makes me smile.
Liked my KRS so much, I swapped it two weeks ago, for a super deal I couldn't refuse, for a like-new '04 KGT with 3,600 miles on the clock and 14 months of warrantee to go. Aside from the very slightly cramped ergos for my 6'4" frame, the bike is simply awesome. Up until this fall, I had steered completely away from the KRS/GT because of all the negative comments I read in the online forums about the bikes' ponderous slow-speed and non-flickable high-speed handling and afterthought styling (GT-specific). After all is said and done, the wait didn't hurt me and I now own what is to me a nearly perfect long-distance tourer.
Last night, I went into Max's for some FastWay footpegs for my GS and, for the umpteenth time, jumped on a new GT. Looked around the bike again and was even more convinced of my earliest reactions: "fuddy-duddy." "This is an RT with a 4-cylinder engine," I said to Max. "They listened to what you wanted (not me personally, of course)," came back Max. This bike sits the rider bolt-upright - like a GoldWing - behind a GoldWing-large windscreen, with legs positioned by feet placed on GoldWing-cramped footpegs. The light, flickable handling of the new GT sacrifices the "rides-on-a-rail" handling of the old.
My lament: now that the old KRS/GT have been replaced with the new models, there is no direct replacement on the K side for either bike. Bolting bags on the new KRS or KRR does not turn them into the equivalent of an old GT (wish it did but the ergos are too tight for all day comfort for many of us older guys - and I ride a modest 500-800 miles per day).
What do others think?
After owning an R1100RT and an R1150GS Adv., I bought a gorgeous '98 K12RS a few months ago from Max BMW (NY). I fell in love with the ride, the power and the handling immediately. The bike's character is a sharp contrast to the R bikes'. Nothing wrong with the Rs, mind you, I still adore my R1150GS and use it for most of my riding, in fact, but the K bike offers something different, perhaps more visceral. The RT left me a bit cold, however, because it was a bit too "fuddy-duddy" or old-mannish for my tastes and seemed a bit too close to the GoldWing end of the spectrum, rather than the sportbike side. The old KRS/GT is clearly closer to the sportbike side. Really makes me smile.
Liked my KRS so much, I swapped it two weeks ago, for a super deal I couldn't refuse, for a like-new '04 KGT with 3,600 miles on the clock and 14 months of warrantee to go. Aside from the very slightly cramped ergos for my 6'4" frame, the bike is simply awesome. Up until this fall, I had steered completely away from the KRS/GT because of all the negative comments I read in the online forums about the bikes' ponderous slow-speed and non-flickable high-speed handling and afterthought styling (GT-specific). After all is said and done, the wait didn't hurt me and I now own what is to me a nearly perfect long-distance tourer.
Last night, I went into Max's for some FastWay footpegs for my GS and, for the umpteenth time, jumped on a new GT. Looked around the bike again and was even more convinced of my earliest reactions: "fuddy-duddy." "This is an RT with a 4-cylinder engine," I said to Max. "They listened to what you wanted (not me personally, of course)," came back Max. This bike sits the rider bolt-upright - like a GoldWing - behind a GoldWing-large windscreen, with legs positioned by feet placed on GoldWing-cramped footpegs. The light, flickable handling of the new GT sacrifices the "rides-on-a-rail" handling of the old.
My lament: now that the old KRS/GT have been replaced with the new models, there is no direct replacement on the K side for either bike. Bolting bags on the new KRS or KRR does not turn them into the equivalent of an old GT (wish it did but the ergos are too tight for all day comfort for many of us older guys - and I ride a modest 500-800 miles per day).
What do others think?