Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know this might not be the place to post this but what is up with the flea market changes?
who controls it now?
why the change?
Please move this to the correct place if anyone knows.
Thank
Dave
When I saw my bike for sale ad going thru them for a fee I stopped watching it. I don't need to pay for help selling anything. Post above noting adv is correct. Have bought and sold many things there.
It's sort of a "reflection" of the postings on the Panjo system. I haven't been on Panjo in a while, IIRC, it used to have something like "see what others have to say" or something like that. Again, from memory, that is what you see in the 4 "in forum" categories.So we still have the member marketplace in the Forum.
What is wrong with that?
Why do we need this Panjo Crap?
Dave
It's sort of a "reflection" of the postings on the Panjo system. I haven't been on Panjo in a while, IIRC, it used to have something like "see what others have to say" or something like that. Again, from memory, that is what you see in the 4 "in forum" categories.
I'm not sure how things are linked up right now.
The Moderators have no control over the Panjo deal.
OM
It always comes down to money$$$$$
Some body is making some $$$ with this panjo stuff
thanks for what you guys do as moderators by the way.
Dave
I'm not familiar with any fee involved. Could you elaborate?I've quit advertising here because of Panjo. Paying to advertise on a site I pay to use was a bridge too far.
My take is Panjo is setting themselves up to get a cut of Paypal fees and the Credit cards. (if not already)
If you want to see a successful time proven flea market go to Adventure Riders.
When you sell/buy something there, it's you and the the other inmate - no interference.
You then have the option to donate to the site if you wish but it is not required.
I can't see why the MOA can't model it.
Bring back the old marketplace if nothing else.
This is a paid membership club and we should have some say.
That last that I was informed about was there was no fee to the Members.Some of the consternation and or confusion comes from checking out the Panjo website and their FAQ page.
http://www.panjo.com/faq
Are there fees?
Selling on Panjo is easy:
Listing an item for sale is FREE.
When you make a sale, 0% -7% of the final value of the sale will be collected, depending on various factors. Any and all fees will be communicated before you finish posting your item.
Standard PayPal fees apply to cash out.
Do these fees apply to member to member transactions?
Lacking any authoritative answer one would assume the answer is yes. Thus, an advertising for sale electronically on the MOA site, which historically was free, now appears to have fees attached to it. The potential benefit of expanded exposure to non members via panjo is very subjective. In the case of genic parts or other items it may be great. However, for BMW specific items the value of the expense escapes me.
I am skeptical that selling on AdvRider is completely FREE. There is no transaction fee for individual deals on the site; however, I have to believe there is a way that the site traffic is monitized in various ways which offset, tangibly or intangibly, the expense of operating the site.
Beyond VBulletin and various technical advantages to using Panjo, does the MOA receive any monetary benefit from transaction fees, if they are charged to member to member transactions? This may be one way to soften the idea of an expense to advertize and sell on the site. My sense is for many it may not.
While I don't visit often, I do like the look of the "new" ADV software as it displays on screen.Of note is that ADV went away from VB and is on another forum system now, specifically related to the costs of using VB. I am not in any way displeased with their new system (or their FM).
I'm not familiar with any fee involved. Could you elaborate?
As I have mentioned, Panjo is watching the threads. Any problems will give them feedback to consider.
TIA
OM
Thanks for the response Kurt. While I have watched the Panjo experience from my hill, there has been a thyme of buyers and selling not being able to communicate........I don't know what the real problem is.The fee to sell my 2013 R1200RT was going to be hundreds of dollars. Sure, the listing was free. I don't even think PayPal will allow a transaction for the amount involved. Using Panjo without PayPal doesn't appear to be an option. I don't like the format, the requirements for payment or the fact that starting an ad in Flea Market places it in the for sale section and vice-versa. The opposite isn't true. Close one ad and the other remains open. I much prefer the AdvRider type options within forums or straight up classified sites. Cycle Trader allowed me to list my RT for free as did Craigslist and various other forums none of which charge me to become a member.
The way I read things when Panjo was first implemented was that the percentage charge could be between zero and 7%.Panjo's FAQ says Panjo charges the seller 7% of the sale price; they collect this by inserting themselves into the transaction and requiring a link to one's bank account. I can understand why Panjo changes - Panjo is a for-profit business. That Panjo offers some kind of "security" or "insurance" is unimportant to me, I've structured my own transactions for decades, and done fine.
All in all, even with pictures, connection to MOA members, and some security, the MOA/Panjo model is not appealing to me. I am far from convinced that I should pay to sell items when other venues (Craigslist, advrider, and the IBMWR Marketplace have been mentioned) don't charge.
OM,
I haven't sold anything via Panjo, I just signed into Panjo and read its FAQ. The FAQ says they'll charge the seller 7%.
My conclusion could be wrong - Panjo's FAQ may be inaccurate vis-a-vis the MOA - but the stated terms don't make me want to sell something to find out. And if the stated terms aren't correct, I'm reluctant to do business with a firm whose FAQs are inaccurate.
I'll just to see others' experiences.