jr31
New member
So running a red light justifies the use of deadly force? You have to be kidding me.
How about speeding? 10 over? 15 over?
Agreed.
How about not wearing a face diaper?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So running a red light justifies the use of deadly force? You have to be kidding me.
How about speeding? 10 over? 15 over?
So running a red light justifies the use of deadly force? You have to be kidding me.
How about speeding? 10 over? 15 over?
So running a red light justifies the use of deadly force? You have to be kidding me.
How about speeding? 10 over? 15 over?
Try to remember that this was supposed to be a comical look at what the prediction of the onset of lane-splitting may be.
OM
Ah yes- so- is lane splitting safe in either direction- with and against traffic? I mean, it’s empty space, what could go wrong?
Try to remember that this was supposed to be a comical look at what the prediction of the onset of lane-splitting may be.
OM
I caught the intent of your original post Gary. The funniest thing about the news report was the “stinger” “tonight, we interview the SUV owner whose vehicle was involved in the apprehension of the perpetrator... all I could think was, slow news day in Mass. (but deep down inside I really want to see that interview)
A misdemeanor offense is not a justification for the use of deadly force, thank goodness.
So running a red light justifies the use of deadly force? You have to be kidding me.
How about speeding? 10 over? 15 over?
Some states evading is a felony.