Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
BradfordBenn said:I can't vote cause I am still attending nationals. But I have a hunch that the forum is the wrong place to ask as most of us are pretty involved in riding and rallying and would go. My guess though is the distance issue. Not everyone can get the time off to go to the rally.
Having said that, I like the idea of having it move around the six(?) zones of the country so that it becomes close enough that people can go.
Michael Friedle said:Hello Mark,
I tried to get a series of questions asking for this very information on the last member survey the MOA did this past year. We already pretty much know WHY people attend the International Rally, BUT only about less than 20% of the members attend in any one year. A fairly small percentage of the club membership have attended three or more International Rallies.
naddy100 said:When rally attendence has been discussed before, one issue was whether the rally was a party or a conference. The origins of the rally are party-ness, and any perceived movement toward conference was seen as bad.
My preference is more toward the conference side. I believe the planners try to balance the two ideas of party and conference.
I haven't been to a national MOA rally, so I don't fit the profile to vote on the original question.
Noel
woodnsteel said:For me, as a relatively new member, Canada, S. Carolina, and Washington were too far away considering my limited vacation time, my ancient bikes, and my ancient carcass having to ride them.