Please correct me if my memory is faulty. A few years ago I took an "advanced rider" class in which SLOW straight riding, U-turns, and tight turns between cones were emphasized. The instructor emphasized we had THREE speed controls at our disposal: throttle, clutch, and rear brake - if that brake was not linked to the front brake. (Mine fortunately is not.)
The advice I remember is 1) throttle should be a constant at about 1500 rpm, 2) you CAN use the clutch only to control speed, 3) it is EASIER to control your speed with the rear brake than the clutch, 4) you CAN combine slight clutch slippage with a little rear brake, but you are making your life more difficult.
For those of us who don't want to (or can't) show off our amazing skills but occasionally need to make a tight U-turn, is there any disadvantage to doing all the speed control with the steady throttle and rear brake, no clutch disengagement? (And yes, I do remember the advice to slide my butt to the high side and swivel my head to look where I want to go rather than at that gravel shoulder I'm afraid I'll hit.
The advice I remember is 1) throttle should be a constant at about 1500 rpm, 2) you CAN use the clutch only to control speed, 3) it is EASIER to control your speed with the rear brake than the clutch, 4) you CAN combine slight clutch slippage with a little rear brake, but you are making your life more difficult.
For those of us who don't want to (or can't) show off our amazing skills but occasionally need to make a tight U-turn, is there any disadvantage to doing all the speed control with the steady throttle and rear brake, no clutch disengagement? (And yes, I do remember the advice to slide my butt to the high side and swivel my head to look where I want to go rather than at that gravel shoulder I'm afraid I'll hit.