ncpbmw1953
Member
Yes, BMW corrects the pressure sensed by the TPMS to 68 degrees, but I'm not convinced that does anything useful... then monitor the TPMS for changes. The actual number doesn't really concern me, it's a change that I worry about.
It absolutely does something useful, and you said it yourself, twice. If you got the actual number instead of temp-compensated, you would need to do some impressive math to figure out what was happening. My best example of this was from a trip in 2016 where we left Big Pine, California at 50F, and then proceeded to ride past Las Vegas on June 5th to St George Utah, and temp for the last 2 hours of that was 112F. TPMS on my '16 R1200RT did not waver at all for the entire day, nor any other days for that matter. If you had watched realtime actual temperature in that incredible heat, uncompensated, would have to do some tricky math in your head at highway speeds to ascertain what was actually happening. Temp-compensated if fabulous and absolutely what is needed if you are...'monitoring TPMS for changes'.
As a side point I count on reported TPMS temps exclusively. Why? There is absolutely no reason to believe my $50 Flaig guage is somehow superior to directly sensed tire pressures. Moreover, BMW actually suggests you adjust to your TPMS readout, not the other way around. After the tire is road-warmed, I can count on TPMS reported temp-compensated pressure being 2 psi lower than what my Flaig says. My tire pump actually correlates perfectly w/ TPMS, but my expensive German main analog Flaig gauge differs by 2psi. Which one is accurate? Don't have a way to calibrate and further, it really doesn't matter. I learned that when the Michelin Rep said to deal w/ severe cupping w/ the wretched PR4GT the solution was to raise the front tire PSI from 36 to 40. Oh, okay I see. Put another way, a few PSI hardly matters, IMO.