OfficerImpersonator
Seattle-area Rounder
So Consumer Reports reviewed a couple of scooters as well as the Ninja 250. Within their reviews were a couple of sidebars on rider training and gear.
Most of the advice was pretty good, except for when I read that riders should replace their helmets every two to four years because the materials degrade and the helmet becomes unsafe simply by aging.
WTF? This is the first I've ever heard of this. I visit this site quite regularly, I read most of the m/c magazines each month (MotorCyclist, Cycle World, Rider, ON, etc.) and I've never seen it mentioned that helmets have an "expiration date". I would think that if this were the case, the helmet manufacturers would keep bombarding us with reminders to periodically replace our helmets when they reached their "pull date".
I know we need to replace our lids if we drop them or crash them, but I've never heard of replacing them just for the sake of replacing them.
Most of the advice was pretty good, except for when I read that riders should replace their helmets every two to four years because the materials degrade and the helmet becomes unsafe simply by aging.
WTF? This is the first I've ever heard of this. I visit this site quite regularly, I read most of the m/c magazines each month (MotorCyclist, Cycle World, Rider, ON, etc.) and I've never seen it mentioned that helmets have an "expiration date". I would think that if this were the case, the helmet manufacturers would keep bombarding us with reminders to periodically replace our helmets when they reached their "pull date".
I know we need to replace our lids if we drop them or crash them, but I've never heard of replacing them just for the sake of replacing them.