Today we had our first 80 degree spring day so we took the new F800GTs out for run- about 120 miles or so.
Both of us had noticed the warm air around the crotch in cooler weather. Not bad at all, even useful sometimes. BUT..
WARNING- the F800GT is a serious crotch roaster in 80 degree weather- to the point a stock one is probably unusable in 90 or 100 degree weather.
The source of the heat is the 2 eyebrow vents in the plastic near the riders knees. Rad heat exits there and is blown directly into the riders crotch for both of us.
This is a rare problem with BMWs- none of our 4 other BMW's directs excess heat on the rider and 2 of them are water cooled K's- a K1200RS and a K1200GT. The F800GT is as bad or worse than some 1980 Hondas I remember.
I am getting really tired of fixing BMW screwups but here is yet another if these bikes are to be summer usable. And it has to be done without creating some other sort of heat problem.
Also, airbox temp control on the F800GT is very poor- data logging shows heat soaking continually raising engine intake air temp while riding- the heat coming from the rad and perhaps the pipes. It is likely to go at least 40 degrees over ambient for intake air temp on a hot day- I got a good part of that on a brief 40 mile highway speed segment today and temps were continuing to climb when logging was stopped. This doesn't impact rider comfort but there is clearly useful free power to be had by getting cold denser air to the motor. Is it too much to expect some basic heat insulation on an airbox?
I would strongly suggest to any of you looking at the F800GT to NOT BUY ONE unless you have done a hot weather demo of at least 20 or 30 miles at highway speed and find the crotch heat level acceptable to you.
When I get around to addressing these issues, I'll post results.
Be nice if BMW did all their homework on new models...I can fix almost anything but this type of very basic goof is inexcusable.
To me this also means that the new watercooled RT is also a no-go unless it passes a hot weather test run (haven't ridden one yet). Folks who don't properly develop one bike can as easily repeat the error with another. HINT- try getting some actual customers to ride development models in hot and cold conditions. The current "professional" crew is missing obvious issues.
Both of us had noticed the warm air around the crotch in cooler weather. Not bad at all, even useful sometimes. BUT..
WARNING- the F800GT is a serious crotch roaster in 80 degree weather- to the point a stock one is probably unusable in 90 or 100 degree weather.
The source of the heat is the 2 eyebrow vents in the plastic near the riders knees. Rad heat exits there and is blown directly into the riders crotch for both of us.
This is a rare problem with BMWs- none of our 4 other BMW's directs excess heat on the rider and 2 of them are water cooled K's- a K1200RS and a K1200GT. The F800GT is as bad or worse than some 1980 Hondas I remember.
I am getting really tired of fixing BMW screwups but here is yet another if these bikes are to be summer usable. And it has to be done without creating some other sort of heat problem.
Also, airbox temp control on the F800GT is very poor- data logging shows heat soaking continually raising engine intake air temp while riding- the heat coming from the rad and perhaps the pipes. It is likely to go at least 40 degrees over ambient for intake air temp on a hot day- I got a good part of that on a brief 40 mile highway speed segment today and temps were continuing to climb when logging was stopped. This doesn't impact rider comfort but there is clearly useful free power to be had by getting cold denser air to the motor. Is it too much to expect some basic heat insulation on an airbox?
I would strongly suggest to any of you looking at the F800GT to NOT BUY ONE unless you have done a hot weather demo of at least 20 or 30 miles at highway speed and find the crotch heat level acceptable to you.
When I get around to addressing these issues, I'll post results.
Be nice if BMW did all their homework on new models...I can fix almost anything but this type of very basic goof is inexcusable.
To me this also means that the new watercooled RT is also a no-go unless it passes a hot weather test run (haven't ridden one yet). Folks who don't properly develop one bike can as easily repeat the error with another. HINT- try getting some actual customers to ride development models in hot and cold conditions. The current "professional" crew is missing obvious issues.