ponch1
Ponch
Exactly.
The changes on the GS signifcantly reduce maintenance and the cost of inevitable long term R&R like clutch jobs etc and eliminate a few sources of seal failures and worn parts. IF the changes are well executed, there will be plenty of benefits but the track record on new models in their first years isn't thrilling, lately. It is in fact a lot like Detroit used to do but with better warranty..
Don't pine for airheads, don't miss carbs, points or other ancient stuff but do like reliable. The current R bikes are extremely easy to service and there is promise of even better with the new one. Current Rs take less work than oilheads by a good margin...The 6 is designed for those who live near a dealer or don't mind carrying their bike to one.
It seems to be a trade off. I had a Kawasaki Nomad before the RT. The Nomad is a very reliable bike and any problems are easily fixed, like cam chain extenders and a stiffer clutch spring. That's it. Now, compared to the RT, the Nomad is somewhat unsophisticated and it isn't the balanced and well thought out machine the BMW is, but it works and doesn't require the care and feeding either. May be the Japanese, namely Honda or Kawasaki, should build BMW's motorcycles.