Within "real world parameters" is there a measurable difference in the quality of the two?
Is a tire freshy out of the mold superior to a two week old tire?
A two week old tire superior to a two month old tire?
Or perhaps is there an "aging curve" that the tire is subject to whereby it improves in quality over a period of time(a ripening effect) and then begins to deteriorate? If so, what is the optimum tire age?
Does it depend on the tire compound? I would think a softer compound would "age" faster than a harder compound, but I admit I do not know.
Does anyone out there have the answer to these questions?
I would take the discount and ignore the difference in tire age.
BTW, I always buy my tires from the vendor that was maligned here, and I am a very satisfied customer of theirs.
I also note from his profile, that the original poster of this thread is riding a 32 year old bike and worried about 2 year old tires!
Not fair, Tom. The actual question was: Given the choice, would you buy a tire made a few months ago, or one made two years ago? Now, it's evident from your questions that you don't know if time and environment affect tire shelf life. So, if there were two of the same brand and model of tire side by side, and the only apparent difference was that one was made two years earlier, which would you buy? The original poster's point was, the older dated tire might be worth less that the current dated tire. I think he has a point. Googling "Tire shelf-life" will give you some interesting, albeit inconsistent, information.