powwow
Member
What product was Ford going to build for Japan that wasn't already available from their subsidiary Mazda? Relative to China, Buick did very well there selling mundane Regals.
In the US, the foreign car companies, for example BMW, Mercedes and, later, VW got whatever tax and development deal they wanted and promises that the local and state governments would fight any efforts to organize the work force. Forget the NAFTA blame game, GM, Ford and Fiat-Dodge are just abandoning everything but the highest profit vehicles (Pick-ups). It's just laziness.
Mazda is not and has never been a subsidiary of Ford. At one time, Ford had a 33% investment in the company, which did give it control. Ford sold most of that stake in 2008 and the remaining shares in 2015.
You are correct...state governments (primarily southern states) in an effort to build a job base, courted all of the foreign manufacturers to build assembly plants. It was pretty ironic when the U.S. legislature was debating whether to bail out GM and Chrysler (Ford did not take any bail out money), Sen Richard Shelby from Alabama was waxing poetic about screw the domestic companies, if they can't survive, just let them fail. Meanwhile, he's shoveling hundreds of millions of dollars in tax breaks to Mercedes, Hyundai and Honda (i.e.$250 million dollars in tax breaks to Mercedes alone) in an effort to entice them to build plants in Alabama (which they did). South Carolina did the same for BMW, Tennessee for Nissan, Georgia for Kia, Texas and Indiana for Toyota, Ohio and Indiana for Honda. I don't blame the states for trying to build an industrial base of jobs, but it certainly makes for an uneven financial playing field for the domestic manufacturers. Of course, the foreign companies were smart and wanted to build primarily in union unfriendly, southern states.
Not sure your point about laziness??? It's more like survival...and we haven't even talked about Asian currency manipulation to keep their vehicles cheap in the U.S.....