mneblett
#32806
Follow-up:
As the first step, I set the "displayed" speeds to be the same as the "measured" speeds, to see how much of a correction would result (i.e., measured 50 kph=displayed 50 kph; 100=100). With my current tire wear, inflation, etc., the displayed speed was actually *higher* that the actual (GPS) speed. That was great, as it meant that with a tweak or two I could get the displayed speed back down to the actual speed.
For today, I set the displayed speeds to be 50=52 and 100=104. Result: near perfect for my bike, being at or within 1/2 kph across the range.
Once again Alex, thank you for posting this!
As the first step, I set the "displayed" speeds to be the same as the "measured" speeds, to see how much of a correction would result (i.e., measured 50 kph=displayed 50 kph; 100=100). With my current tire wear, inflation, etc., the displayed speed was actually *higher* that the actual (GPS) speed. That was great, as it meant that with a tweak or two I could get the displayed speed back down to the actual speed.
For today, I set the displayed speeds to be 50=52 and 100=104. Result: near perfect for my bike, being at or within 1/2 kph across the range.
Once again Alex, thank you for posting this!