Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know, but this is - verbatim - the standard line for the standard reason for getting them. The protector for my '08 GT is a lot more than $40 and for protecting against something that may have .00001 percent chance of happening makes little economic sense. My comment when I started the thread was that in over 1,000,000 miles I never had a cracked headlamp and was wondering why so many are hawking protection.I consider the headlight cover to be insurance. I picked mine up from a club member used for about $40. Cheap insurance considering what a headlight assembly costs.
I know, but this is - verbatim - the standard line for the standard reason for getting them. The protector for my '08 GT is a lot more than $40 and for protecting against something that may have .00001 percent chance of happening makes little economic sense. My comment when I started the thread was that in over 1,000,000 miles I never had a cracked headlamp and was wondering why so many are hawking protection.
Thank you, Crow, for your well-considered response. I guess I really don't know if my car is less susceptible to headlight damage than a bike because it is lower. Could be. I do pick up a few nicks in my windshield - probably one a year - from thrown stones.This is one of those "Your Mileage May Vary" questions. Where I live they put gravel down on the roads when it gets icy, and vehicles kick up all sorts of crap for the next three months. I took a direct hit on my K75's headlight in the first 5,000 miles (my F650 came with a protector, so I don't know if it's ever been hit). In the course of a few hundred winter and spring commutes, my bikes and I have been hit by lots of rocks in lots of different places. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think in your neck of the woods they use sand and salt (and snowplows, too--what a novel concept).
You asked another question a while back about car headlights v. bike headlights and their relative susceptibility to rocks. I think, and I should be clear that this is pure conjecture, that bike headlights are in more danger because they are higher. Figure a car going about 50 mph could kick up a rock with enough velocity to do damage. If your car's headlight is 24 inches off the road surface, but your bike's headlight is 36 inches (again, I'm just pulling numbers out of hammerspace here), you'd need to be a lot closer in the car for the rock to hit your headlight. Probably tailgating distance, but I'd have to actually do some math to be sure. When you're in your car, do you find that rocks hit your windshield? That's probably closer to the right height.
The thing about buying a protector is this: unless something really big hits you, you will never know if it's done its job. If the $80 or whatever is going to eat you up inside every time you see the thing on the front of your bike, then it's probably worth living dangerously, at least until you do take a rock. On the other hand, if you wonder if every pebble that comes at you is going to be the one that costs you $500, maybe the $80 is worth it. It's your psychology. Me. I'm cheap: my K75 is patched with clear silicone and seems to be holding steady, but if I ever have to replace the glass I'll probably buy a protector at the same time.