• Welcome, Guest! We hope you enjoy the excellent technical knowledge, event information and discussions that the BMW MOA forum provides. Some forum content will be hidden from you if you remain logged out. If you want to view all content, please click the 'Log in' button above and enter your BMW MOA username and password.

    If you are not an MOA member, why not take the time to join the club, so you can enjoy posting on the forum, the BMW Owners News magazine, and all of the discounts and benefits the BMW MOA offers?

  • Beginning April 1st, and running through April 30th, there is a new 2024 BMW MOA Election discussion area within The Club section of the forum. Within this forum area is also a sticky post that provides the ground rules for participating in the Election forum area. Also, the candidates statements are provided. Please read before joining the conversation, because the rules are very specific to maintain civility.

    The Election forum is here: Election Forum

1984 R100RT - auxiliary light and rear tire size

waishiunyc

New member
Hi Folks... Nice to be a new MOA member here ;-)

I have two questions re my 1984 R100RT... I am think of mounting a pair of auxiliary lights -- either Denali or Clearwater -- but am unsure what mounting option I should use. Have you any experience mounting lights onto this particular RT model? What mount do you use? Can you post some pics?

Second, someone told me that I can use up to a 120mm width tire for the rear (stock is 4.00H18). Does anyone here use anything wider than 4.00 tires on the rear?

Thanks for the help,
Wai
 
If you have crash bars, top of crash bar mount is good.

The bike was intended for inch sized tires. 3.25x19 front and 4.00x18 rear is what the bike is designed for. The 120 tire is metric sized and is a 90 profile vs. the original which is a 100 profile. The 120 is also difficult to get on and off because of clearance at the final drive. 110 is the widest "wrong" rear tire that I would use.

Wider is not better. Bikes are designed from the tires up. When you change the size of the tires, you become the bike designer because a number of handling related dimensions are changed with tire size.
 
If you have crash bars, top of crash bar mount is good.

Beemerphile - thanks. I should have added that I prefer not to add a crash bar -- it is my understanding (could be wrong) that installing a crash bar means cutting into the fairing, which I prefer not to do.

Does anyone else know of a mounting solution that doesn't involve a crash bar?


The bike was intended for inch sized tires. 3.25x19 front and 4.00x18 rear is what the bike is designed for. The 120 tire is metric sized and is a 90 profile vs. the original which is a 100 profile. The 120 is also difficult to get on and off because of clearance at the final drive. 110 is the widest "wrong" rear tire that I would use.

Wider is not better. Bikes are designed from the tires up. When you change the size of the tires, you become the bike designer because a number of handling related dimensions are changed with tire size.

I agree with you... I was asking out of precaution after hearing that suggestion. Thanks again.
 
Beemerphile - thanks. I should have added that I prefer not to add a crash bar -- it is my understanding (could be wrong) that installing a crash bar means cutting into the fairing, which I prefer not to do.

Does anyone else know of a mounting solution that doesn't involve a crash bar?

I mounted my "generic" lights under the lip of the fairing. It depends on the size of the lights and base if they will fit.
1981 R100RT
rt fog lights.jpg
 
PAS -

Did you slip a thin piece of metal between the upper and lower parts of the fairing, and then had a hole drilled in the exposed plate to mount the lights? Seems like a decent way to go.
 
light mount

I had seen lights mounted under the fairing lip on a metal bracket a couple of years ago in the Airhead's club forum. I thought it was a great idea as I would not have to cut holes in the lowers and mount tip over bars.

When I asked if a member could send me a template of the mounting bars they used or, a better picture of the bars used so I could get a better idea as to how the lights were mounted, I got a smart assed reply from the jackass moderator. I should invite my buddies over for beer and the lights might get mounted.

Needles to say, I never got a picture or answer from that forum.

I am still interested in seeing a picture of the bar and material used as well as mounting points. Perhaps a template and type of material used.

I find this forum has courteous members, at least the moderators are better so far than the Airhead forum.
 
120 / 90 - 18 is fine. They fit with a good shove, have a variety of interesting useful tread designs/load ranges and provide a larger contact patch. No issues with clearance with /6, /7 swing arms including the large tube swing arms of the early 80's as I have them mounted to two airheads in my garage, a 77 and an 83 - right now. If you don't fully inflate them prior to installing the wheel they do slip between the swing arm and final drive splines/brakes much easier.
 
I will never put a 120 on my /7 again. Way too much effort to put and take off. Note that all 120 tires don't have the same width...so while one might work OK, another might not. As has been said, wider doesn't really help with handling.

Plus the metric tires lowered the bike so much that it made my sidestand unuseable.
 
Just to add to Kurt's sage advice, as much effort as it takes to remove an oversize tire there will be even more when reinstalling it. I once came within a blond one of collapsing my main stand as I struggled to push the wheel forward into place.
Russ
 
PAS -

Did you slip a thin piece of metal between the upper and lower parts of the fairing, and then had a hole drilled in the exposed plate to mount the lights? Seems like a decent way to go.

No plate, they are mounted to the fairing itself. The base of these cheap lights fit under there perfectly.
 
Back
Top