Well, the news is starting to trickle in.
https://www.bennetts.co.uk/bikesocia...50rt-vvt-spied
Well, the news is starting to trickle in.
https://www.bennetts.co.uk/bikesocia...50rt-vvt-spied
Another thread from this morning.
https://forums.bmwmoa.org/showthread...1250-GS-amp-RT
Lee
2016 R1200RS
MOA # 30878
Past BMW Bikes: 2011 K1300S, 2003 K1200RS, 1991 K75S, 1987 K75T, 1984 R100RT
That’s excellent.
It’s fun speculating about the new model.
So.......... were one soon to be in the market for a new boxer, would it behoove one to wait for the new 1250RT? The HP jump from 123-ish to 144-ish makes my heart go pitter pat.
Or............ does one follow the old rule about never buying the first generation of a new motor?
Thoughts, please?
Personally I would never buy a first year production of anything. And for sure not a first year BMW motorcycle especially with the change to VVT.
Bigger displacement is no big deal at all and I would have no issues. But the VVT is a significant change to the internals of the motor.
I think a year or two would be advisable on this one but then again who knows. It could be a flawless transition.
All I know is the 1st Gen(14-16) LC are going to take a resale hit, the second Gen LC(17-19) are going to take a resale hit so I will be keeping my 17.5 GS until I get my moneys worth out of it. Otherwise you are going to take a financial blood bath to step up to the 1250 with VVT.
Lee
2017.5 R 1200 GSW
Personally, IF I really wanted more power I'd ditch the two banger and go for 4 or 6 cylinders. No comparison if that's what you're really looking for. I'd much rather see the RT lose some pounds instead... keeping up with the Jones's isn't my thing.
I bought a 2014 first-year R1200RTW. No regrets, though later I did buy a white 2017 RT that I repainted Granada red to match my 1967 R60/2.
I admit that I am up in years, so that affects this thought: I have no need for more than 125 HP in my motorcycle. Indeed, I doubt I have ever used that much power in my RT. In my F-150 and turbo Subaru, yes, I have used more horsepower.
![]()
Jeff Dean
Tucson, Arizona, and Madison, Wisconsin
Co-founder, 1972, of BMW MOA -- http://bmwdean.com/r1200rtw.htm
2017 R1200RT, 2019 R1250RT, 1967 R60/2
I think BMW can get it right with variable valve timing. It’s not new internal combustion engine technology and one thing the Germans are good at is mechanical engineering. They don’t seem to be as good as Americans at software and integration (think TFT displays) and that’s why they’re having so many problems in that regard. Time will tell but I wouldn’t hesitate to buy the bike if I could afford to do so.
Frank Smith
New Market AL
2016 R1200GSA
1994 R80RT
That sure is a pretty red RTW!
I too have purchased a few first year models including the 2014RT, and then the RS. But the GS had already been out with the wet head for a year, so the engine had already had some minor changes I believe before the RT came out. The RS had no real engine changes. I wonder why they wouldn't do the GS or GSA first again? Not sure I would buy a first year major redesign this drastic. It would really have to have some special upgrades for me to consider that. I'm in the market for a GS or an RT again but the current models are still very nice. Especially the GS with the TFT display.
I think I read that changes in European emissions regulations are pushing BMW to get the updated engines out earlier, so that the new boxer variations have to be released within a much shorter time frame. Makes me think this will be the last year for the camhead R nineT.
Larry
2006 R1200RT