Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Annie has both a F650GS (twin precursor to the F700GS) and a F800GS. When she bought the 800 she struggled with the decision between the 800 and a 700. (I encouraged her to get a second bike so that we would both have two bikes capable of long trips). In retrospect paying the extra amount for the 800 was money spent on increased off road capabilities she does not need, and getting characteristics (tube tires and increased height) she does not want. She bought the 650 while we lived in Alaska. It made five trips between Alaska and the states, been ridden many miles on dirt roads in Alaska and made cross country trips in the lower 48. It is up to the task for all of these uses. Unless you plan on doing some serious off road riding the 700 is all you need, and you get a lower price, tubeless tires and a lower center of gravity.
I've owned and ridden all 4 of the mentioned bikes and can't believe that anyone would spend money without riding them to see if they fit their idea of a bike they want to own.
I should add that I never test rode any of them prior to purchase.
I'm weird that way. If I like the looks, I'll buy things. Never been disapointed. Guess I'm very lucky. As I said before, I do fly planes for a bit before purchase.
Annie has both a F650GS (twin precursor to the F700GS) and a F800GS. When she bought the 800 she struggled with the decision between the 800 and a 700. (I encouraged her to get a second bike so that we would both have two bikes capable of long trips). In retrospect paying the extra amount for the 800 was money spent on increased off road capabilities she does not need, and getting characteristics (tube tires and increased height) she does not want. She bought the 650 while we lived in Alaska. It made five trips between Alaska and the states, been ridden many miles on dirt roads in Alaska and made cross country trips in the lower 48. It is up to the task for all of these uses. Unless you plan on doing some serious off road riding the 700 is all you need, and you get a lower price, tubeless tires and a lower center of gravity.
Thank you Marty, your comments are helpful. I love the 1200GS and the RT. Maybe I need to do weight lifting to increase my strength.
I find on pavement, I can handle either, but moving around in the garage is tricky, never dropped it, but they are tall and heavy, especially with a full tank of gas. The new RT has a lessened inner leg curve that helps with getting both feet on the ground, and when I took one for test ride (when it came out) I thought WOW this is the bike for me.
But it won't do for off-road. Maybe I'm kidding myself about the off-road bit, but I really want to explore beyond the payment.
If I lived in the Alps, not sure I'ld care. But in North America, good paved roads are limited (within an easy driving range) AND there are a ton of off-roads all over the place.
The off-road course I take on the 250's will likely compel me to pursue or turn me off of off-roading. So one step at a time.
I plan on changing up my bike to a new one in the early spring. So want to decide by Jan/Feb.
I am heading for the F700GS, but will need to ride the F800GS to compare the difference.
I am also going to take a two day side car course by http://evergreenmotorcycletraining.org to determine if a Ural might be the off-road vehicle of choice. Never ridden a hack, but my wife, who is 10 years my senior says she would consider coming in it. She will never get on a mc as a pillion.
I am a Professional Engineer, and one could say I analyze too much, live too little. That might be true.
However, I do have a budget, and a spouse, and she supports my passion, but there are limits with her tolerance for my spending.
In a perfect world, I would have 2 or 3 bikes of various types. Not sure I could afford the insurance living in Canada. I have over 25 years driving without an accident, so I get the cheapest rate available, but the RT still costs about $2,000 per year to insure. so three bikes would be upwards of $6,000! That's a lot of money in my world.
I envy your position to have both the F700GS and R1200GS.
Thanks for sharing.
A couple of thoughts/observations related to some points you made in this post:
- It's counterintuitive, but none the less true, that it's easier to pick up an R1200GS (with proper protection guards) than it is even a 650GS or anything in between. The reason for that is that it rests on the crash bar so you're not lifting the bike from laying flat but sitting up at a angle. This makes a big difference and I can definitively state that it's easier to pick up my 1200GS than my 650 KLR (which on paper weighs 80lbs less).
- the 1200GS has a low CG making it easy to maneuver it tight places if your technique is proper
- the 1200GS has a hydraulic clutch making it much easier crawl along using the friction zone to control the bike when moving slowly over challenging terrain.
- I'm 5'9" with a 30" inseam and my feet are closer to the ground on my standard high GS than the other bikes.
I recently returned from the BMW Performance Center Off-Road School in Greer SC. BTW, there was a gentleman from BC there on his own GSA taking the class that had ridden it there. They have the full range of GS bikes available for their 2 days of challenging skills training available for student use. It's the feeling of the instructors there that the GS is the easiest bike of the lot to ride in challenging terrain. According to the instructors there, they've had many students sign up for a 650GS only to swap it out for a 1200GS by mid-day after their hand cramped working the cable clutch.
These 1200GS/A bikes are amazing machines. How wonderful is it that the most capable off-road adventure machine made by BMW is also an amazing bike for traveling long distances on the road! This past weekend, I rode my 2016 R1200GS about 300 miles on the road to get to the Allegheny Mountains. I took everything I needed for two nights of camping in Marienville PA on the bike. We spent the entire day Saturday riding very sloppy, wet, rocky ATV trails - some pretty challenging parts with steep climbs and descents. Then returned home the following day 300 miles running as fast as any traffic on the expressway. All on the same bike, same tires. Now that I've got several thousand miles on my GS, been to the off-road school, and put many hundreds of miles on it off-road, I feel like it is more a broad array of capabilities than any kind of compromise bike.
It takes some special skills and proper judgement to take any of these big bikes off in the woods on challenging tracks. But if you're up to the challenge, it opens up some amazing experiences.
My wife is 5'7" and she rode for years a G650GS and liked it. Then she rode an R1200GSA (lowered) and loves it. She says the balance is better. She and I just completed a 1,600 mile trip with 500 miles of it being in gravel/dirt/mud on some very challenging terrain - 20% grades, narrow roads, two-track and she did absolutely great on it. She said the bike is built for standing up and taking bumps and tight slow speed turns. She went so far as saying it was way easier riding than her G650GS. The only time she dropped it was in heavy stop-and-go traffic at the end of the trip - she forgot it was in 2nd gear and it stalled.
I rode the trip on my F800GS and thoroughly enjoy it too. I am a taller rider - 6'3" with a 34" inseam so the F800GS fits me well. I do like it's nimbleness, get-up-and-go, and balance. I believe it's a bit heavy in the rear so I stand up a lot to put weight on the front when riding challenging off-roads and terrain. On pavement, I don't like the vibration at higher speeds when you got to do those highway sections. Also when road touring on it it's higher up and so I don't take the corners as fast. If you're doing long hours in the saddle it's not as comfortable - suspension, seat, vibration - as my RT. So if I'm going to go far on pavement it's the RT for me.
My wife however, says her 1200GSA rides great whether on pavement or off-road. She had an R1150RT but she says her 1200GSA is a way better comfort machine. Smooth at high speeds and on pavement corners. Better handling at low speeds. Better balanced feeling. She loves the many riding modes it has (Rain, Road, Enduro, Dynamic) and uses them to her advantage depending on conditions.
View attachment 57971
I'm looking at switching from 2008 R1200 RT to a GS. So tell me your thoughts regarding the pros and cons of the F800, F700, vs R1200GS.
Or maybe you want to chime in about the G650GS?
Okay, given the threads below, (today is July 19, 2016), it seems I was way too vague for many people. Others chimed in, on an assumption of the question I was asking, and they made the right assumption. I am looking for your thoughts on pros and cons of the different models.
However, to give you better background... I add the following information....
My history: I am a street rider and ride a 2008 R1200RT with a low seat.
I am 5' 8" tall and weigh about 156 lbs.
I have a 28.5" in-seam with bare feet.
I am 56 years old.
I am not as "strong as a bull"; maybe a yearling calf.
I have (maybe it is all in my head) a spirit of adventure with a desire to go off-road.
Will I go off-road lots? I don't know.
Will it be fire roads and a few trails, but nothing too hairy - most likely.
Will I only go off-road a wee tiny little bit, maybe? I don't know yet.
Stopping with one foot down is normal for me, but on the pavement or a gravel parking lot.
I can pick and choose where I stop (99% of time). I expect off-road, I may not always have that choice of nice even ground or at least ground with the right camber.
I rode a 2014 F700GS for two days in the Alps (regular suspension, low seat) in Aug 2014.
I rented and rode a 2015 R1200GS, low suspension, regular seat, for two weeks on a tour of the Alps. (I LOVE the boxer motor...)
I am interested in other peoples personal experiences, points of views and why they made the bike the choices for them that they do; re: the models above, or another off-road dual sport.
My issue, if I go off road, is size and weight. That is the reason I am pondering and looking for other people's views on the other bikes.
No, I won't buy a bike without riding it for a day, or more, to really be able to test it out, at least with a few hours in the saddle, even if it is on pavement only.
A little jaunt, for me, doesn't inform me properly, I need more time than 20 minutes around the block a few times - which is what the local dealers will allow, if they allow you to get on a bike at all.
I live near Vancouver, BC and the local dealers are pretty stingy about test rides.
I likely will end up renting the F800GS for a day.
In Aug 2016 I am taking a 6 hour off-road course on (250cc) small bikes.
Likely in Feb I will go to California and take a two day course, Rawhide Adventures, on one of the three mentioned bikes above (R1200GS, F800GS, G650GS - which are the three models that I believe they have).
I won't make a decision to buy a bike on what other's tell me they did, I have a curious mind; and am interested in why people chose what they chose. Some of those reasons may be applicable to me; some will not.
Others may not care what anyone thinks or does, or why they made the choice they did. They make their own choices, based on their own assumptions and experiences, and as such believe, and perhaps are, omnipotent. I am not, and I have no problem admitting it.
I hope the above provides enough explanation for the reader to understand why I ask...
"Hey, can you share your thoughts, opinions and experiences regarding the models mentioned above so I can get a better understanding of some of the different things I might consider when choosing a new dual sport model?"
Oh, and yes, I am subscribed to this thread and come back often. That is who I am. I ask a question, hope for feedback, and read what others write. I value your thoughts and experiences.
Thanks in advance for posting...
Did you attend RawHyde?