mneblett
#32806
A tad touchy? I did not resort to a personal attack, I commented on what I remembered to be your position on the issue. Did I remember incorrectly?News flash Mark -
I asked the OP why he chose to lane split under the conditions present. I will await his answer, if he so wishes.
Your 'expert' psycho-analysis of what I'm currently thinking is unnecessary.
(BTW, I also stated that I was waiting to hear what the OP said.)
There was no "psycho-analysis" ("expert" or otherwise). Based on your previous comments (again, if I remember incorrectly, please let me know) I stated the obvious counter-argument to the obvious argument that lane-splitting isn't needed. That's not pyscho-analysis, it's discussing differing opinions.
I'm surprised at the snippy response, as I've respected your input in the past (even if I disagree on the lane-splitting issue).
Unwarranted.