rkasal
Unavailable for comment
Maybe you guys missed an important part: It sucked to moderate that forum. It consumed more resources than the rest of the forums and the perception was that there weren't many members that posted there.
If you want to talk politics, step up to the big leagues: http://www.advrider.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=49
It's only a matter of time before someone starts to grumble about the Photography forum. I think there are pretty large differences between those two forums. The Photography forum seems to be attracting a wide range of members as posters. DGT did not.
It would be tempting to pull the PC card out and claim that DGT was removed because folks want to be PC. The truth is that DGT was a playground for small number of participants and the resources spent to support it did not warrant the effort.
Remember, I supported DGT at creation, but as it progressed, it was evident that it was only being used by a small number of members.
I did initially miss an important point.
It is my understanding the moderators receive a report tag when some little self-appointed censor views what they consider inappropriate. Why, then, since the moderators would not have to read every post is this a drain on resources? I do not believe the moderators would receive a report tag for every single post in every single thread.
Since the usage of DGT was greater (in a shorter time) than some of the established forums, 2/3rds of the members polled (although unscientific) thought DGT did not suck, and since the moderators needn't have been reading each thread, I have indeed missed an important point. Just why was DGT actually cancelled?
And by the way, the big leagues are baiting terrorists and turning them in.