Page 1 of 9 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 135

Thread: What was wrong with the Criusers?

  1. #1

    What was wrong with the Criusers?

    I love the BMW Phoenix and Montauk.

    What would you have done to them if you were an engineer at BMW to make them more acceptable to the Cruiser crowd?

    How could they evolved to make them compete with the HDs & VTXs?

    Is there any chance that BMW will again pick up a cruiser line.

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Gaylord, Michigan
    Posts
    7
    They under powered them. The other BMWs of the time had lots more power.

  3. #3
    You would have to take the pipes off so they sounded right
    Paul Glaves - "Big Bend", Texas U.S.A
    "The greatest challenge to any thinker is stating the problem in a way that will allow a solution." - Bertrand Russell
    http://web.bigbend.net/~glaves/

  4. #4
    Ohlins shocks and pipes with more "authority" for starters.

  5. #5
    Still Wondering mika's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Fly Over Land
    Posts
    11,807
    The Four P's - Power, Pipes, Phatand Profile

    They were underpowered.
    They sounded like a BMW not a crusier.
    They had the lines and style but somehow they did not look Pretty hot and tempting.
    and for the time they needed a big fat rear tire profile.

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Northern Front Range, CO
    Posts
    6,663
    I took a demo on one. I owned a K11RS at the time. I had previously owned a H-D FLH (fat loud heavy).
    The R12C tried to straddle the fence between a BMW (a definitive sport-tourer) and a cruiser (long on looks and "feel", short on power and handling). It ended up being neither fish nor fowl- it did not have real BMW handling nor power, nor did it have the classic cruiser sound or look to it.
    i seriously doubt that BMW could have made the break necessary from their own history to make that bike competitive in that particular arena.
    Ride Safe, Ride Lots

  7. #7
    Registered User ANDYVH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Green Bay, WI
    Posts
    2,376
    Much like the V-Rod is not seen as a "Harley" in its own market, the R1200C was not seen as a "BMW" in its own market.

    Harley has learned over the decades that anything that doesn't fit the HD mold doesn't sell. That is probably THE main reason HDs are still the bikes they are, heavy, low slung, under-powered, but shiny and make the desired noise. Its simply what sells in the USA.

    BMW tried, but in the respects others mentioned missed the "cruiser" mark by a long shot. Even a HD made more torque, but the R1200C had the HP, if you spun it. Perhaps if BMW had really been different and made a cruiser with comfort and smooth, useable real power it might have done better. But since it was down alomst 20hp compared to other Oilheads it simply didn't fit.
    Get trained! The best "performance" upgrade you can get is YOU. Visit msf-usa.org for training info.

  8. #8
    Hey Chromehead ! bobs98's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Marlton, South Jersey
    Posts
    1,379

    Love my '98 C

    Classic and elegant styiling, powerful looks and superb handling are all descriptive terms for the entire C family. Put on a set of ZTech pipes and it sounds great, too. BMW stopped selling them because they stopped marketing them. In 98 or 99, they were the top selling model in the US.

    Lots of cruiser enthusiasts over at chromeheads.org. But we are definitely the afterthought of the BMW crowd.

    Good thing you all make me feel so welcome here!
    Bob Smith
    1998 R1200C
    2005 Rocket III

  9. #9
    This is an apples vs oranges discussion. The R1200C models aren't like BMWs and they aren't like other cruisers? So what. They are low hp for the market, that's a fact; even BMWs product line proves this. They aren't like HD, because they're shaft drive. They aren't watercooled. It's more about what they aren't that is a positive thing, for me. They kick butt when riding with those other cruisers and I can keep up with lots of sport bikes around our mountain roads. I like this comment I received from a two-up on an ST1100 after a group ride one day, "We thought we'd stay in the rear with you, 'cause you'd go slow, but you really hauled ***!" Geez, I was only slow to leave the parking lot because I was still putting on my riding gear.

  10. #10

    There is Nothing Wrong with the Cruiser.

    I've owned Hondas to Harleys Airheads and K bikes. Still have my 73 R75/5 toaster. The best and ONLY comment I ever got on a motorcycle was on my 2002 R1200c. They noted: "Now there is a bike that when they designed it they didn't look at any other motorcycle". This is why I own two. The other being a sidecar rig.
    Under-power? How fast and how often are you riding over 100? In your rush hour? HA!
    Comfort? I did the iron butt's SS1000 on a stock bike. 35 bikes out me the last, I was 5th back in under 16.5 hours. Dream ride.
    As they say, to each their own... I agree...
    But above all it's not another cookie cutter clone. Nothing else looks rides or handles like it and if you keep calling yourself an individual, it's certainly the right place to start.
    Last edited by grafikfeat; 12-21-2007 at 07:04 PM. Reason: Typos

  11. #11
    Registered User MOTOR31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Full timr RV'er, where we park is home. No fixed address or location.
    Posts
    2,223
    I looked at a couple CLC's. I actually didn't mind the look other than the "leather" bags. I really liked the driving position and height. What did turn me off was the low power. Once I found out about that issue I never looked at them again. I was looking to move up in power from a K75RT and the CLC just didn't cut it. Damn STUPID decision on the part of BMW to detune the engine. I hope whoever made that decision is now selling scooters in Greenland.
    DEFINITION OF A VETERAN A Veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a check made payable to "The United States of America", for an amount of "up to and including my life."
    Author Unknown

  12. #12
    RIDERR1150GSADV
    Guest
    Most everybody hit it on the head with the lack of power. They could have been more successful if they sounded better and had more oomph, they didn't and faded away.....Why they were de-tuned like that only BMW knows, but an RT engine would have been very nice...

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Northern Front Range, CO
    Posts
    6,663
    Quote Originally Posted by bobs98 View Post
    Classic and elegant styiling, powerful looks and superb handling are all descriptive terms for the entire C family. Put on a set of ZTech pipes and it sounds great, too. BMW stopped selling them because they stopped marketing them. In 98 or 99, they were the top selling model in the US.

    Lots of cruiser enthusiasts over at chromeheads.org. But we are definitely the afterthought of the BMW crowd.

    Good thing you all make me feel so welcome here!
    "superb handling"? well, maybe compared to another cruiser, but not even close to other BMWs. and certainly not compared to the more sporting models.

    remember- the question of this thread was "what was WRONG with the Cruisers?".. not "What do you love about your C model?"
    Ride Safe, Ride Lots

  14. #14
    Registered User rocketmanli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Bay Shore, NY
    Posts
    593
    Only thing wrong with the cruiser is that I didn't buy mine sooner.

  15. #15
    To each his own. First time I laid my eyes on a BMW cruiser all I could think was wow, that is one ugly motorcycle.
    "Wow I didn't know BMW made motorcycles, Yeah I think Honda does too."

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •