gtrider
52184
I'm helping a friend and fellow member with a 2002 R1150RT that is intermittently shutting down like it's been turned off, and not always restarting. The bike has had a new Hall sensor installed by the owner in the course of other work (clutch slave cylinder, alternator belt, brake flush) but had been exhibiting shutdown behavior before any of that work was started. Positioning of the Hall sensor and all pulleys was verified and timing checked out OK.
Aside from the Hall unit, the primary suspect has been the wiring harness up by the steering neck. That harness has been opened up--the green wire was showing serious damage so was replaced back to it's source on each end, and the red wire closely inspected but no damage was seen there.
The bike ran well for several days and a few hundred miles, then once again shut down and refused to restart. After retrieving the bike I checked for spark using a timing light (present) and read the codes with my GS-911, and found this:
288 "Throttle Position Sensor, Internal Fault on Upper or lower Potentiometer Slider. The fault is currently present."
The battery was then disconnected for 10 minutes or so, reconnected, and switched on so a TPS reset could be performed. After that the bike fired up and codes were cleared via GS-911. After a shutdown and subsequent restart the codes were read again and no faults were found.
I've not heard of common failures on the TPS sensors, and in this case the next step will be to trace the wiring from TPS to ECU, but my question is this: If the TPS signal is interrupted would the bike normally do an immediate shutdown or would it spit/sputter briefly before shutting down? I'd have expected a problem with the slider in the TPS would be a momentary issue that would be bypassed as the throttle was turned and the TPS pickup moved off the bad portion of the slider. Yes? No?
The next step is going to be to re-trace/re-inspect the wiring at the steering neck, bypass the sidestand switch, and possibly trace the wires and disable the engine cut-off switch then go for a long test ride and burn a tank of gas or two. If no shutdowns are experienced then the two switches can be reconnected one at a time and the test repeated--the owner doesn't mind doing test rides so long as I'm available to retrieve him with a trailer.
Any other suggestions would be welcomed!
Best,
DeVern
Aside from the Hall unit, the primary suspect has been the wiring harness up by the steering neck. That harness has been opened up--the green wire was showing serious damage so was replaced back to it's source on each end, and the red wire closely inspected but no damage was seen there.
The bike ran well for several days and a few hundred miles, then once again shut down and refused to restart. After retrieving the bike I checked for spark using a timing light (present) and read the codes with my GS-911, and found this:
288 "Throttle Position Sensor, Internal Fault on Upper or lower Potentiometer Slider. The fault is currently present."
The battery was then disconnected for 10 minutes or so, reconnected, and switched on so a TPS reset could be performed. After that the bike fired up and codes were cleared via GS-911. After a shutdown and subsequent restart the codes were read again and no faults were found.
I've not heard of common failures on the TPS sensors, and in this case the next step will be to trace the wiring from TPS to ECU, but my question is this: If the TPS signal is interrupted would the bike normally do an immediate shutdown or would it spit/sputter briefly before shutting down? I'd have expected a problem with the slider in the TPS would be a momentary issue that would be bypassed as the throttle was turned and the TPS pickup moved off the bad portion of the slider. Yes? No?
The next step is going to be to re-trace/re-inspect the wiring at the steering neck, bypass the sidestand switch, and possibly trace the wires and disable the engine cut-off switch then go for a long test ride and burn a tank of gas or two. If no shutdowns are experienced then the two switches can be reconnected one at a time and the test repeated--the owner doesn't mind doing test rides so long as I'm available to retrieve him with a trailer.
Any other suggestions would be welcomed!
Best,
DeVern