• Welcome Guest! If you are already a member of the BMW MOA, please log in to the forum in the upper right hand corner of this page. Check "Remember Me?" if you wish to stay logged in.

    We hope you enjoy the excellent technical knowledge, event information and discussions that the BMWMOA forum provides. Why not take the time to join the club, so you can enjoy posting on the forum, the club magazine, and all of the discounts and benefits the BMWMOA offers?

    Want to read the MOA monthly magazine for free? Take a 3-month test ride of the magazine; check here for details.

  • NOTE. Some content will be hidden from you. If you want to view all content, you must register for the forum if you are not a member, or if a member, you must be logged in.

This thread is going to be stale and unimaginative, don't look.

By my calculations, this thread averaged 3.273 posts per day between 7-31-2007 (when all this nothingenness started..........or is it ended............????????????????) and one year later 8-31-08. In the first six months it was 5.737 post per day...roughly.

Between 8-31-08 and today the average is 1.045. Obviously I have a lot to do in my life......

I believe we are doing exactly as required here. Decending in to nothingness........
 
By my calculations, this thread averaged 3.273 posts per day between 7-31-2007 (when all this nothingenness started..........or is it ended............????????????????) and one year later 8-31-08. In the first six months it was 5.737 post per day...roughly.

Between 8-31-08 and today the average is 1.045. Obviously I have a lot to do in my life......

I believe we are doing exactly as required here. Decending in to nothingness........
Facinatinlg boring statistic.:drink :whistle
 
Nothing More, Nothing Less

So, according to Moondog's calculations, we started out by producing a lot of nothing, but have now reached a point where our output of nothing has significantly decreased. Clearly, our Nothing Quotient (NQ) is in a state of decline. Is this a good thing or a bad thing?

If our ultimate goal is to reach perfect nothingness, then it would seem that a lot less of something (i.e., nothing) is superior to a lot more of the same. More or less . . .

:cat
 
So, according to Moondog's calculations, we started out by producing a lot of nothing, but have now reached a point where our output of nothing has significantly decreased. Clearly, our Nothing Quotient (NQ) is in a state of decline. Is this a good thing or a bad thing?

If our ultimate goal is to reach perfect nothingness, then it would seem that a lot less of something (i.e., nothing) is superior to a lot more of the same. More or less . . .

:cat

uh???????????
 
So, according to Moondog's calculations, we started out by producing a lot of nothing, but have now reached a point where our output of nothing has significantly decreased. Clearly, our Nothing Quotient (NQ) is in a state of decline. Is this a good thing or a bad thing?

If our ultimate goal is to reach perfect nothingness, then it would seem that a lot less of something (i.e., nothing) is superior to a lot more of the same. More or less . . .

:cat
But if you have more of the same, nothing, how can that be less if it is more. Or is it more of less of the same or less of more.
 
Back
Top