• Welcome, Guest! We hope you enjoy the excellent technical knowledge, event information and discussions that the BMW MOA forum provides. Some forum content will be hidden from you if you remain logged out. If you want to view all content, please click the 'Log in' button above and enter your BMW MOA username and password.

    If you are not an MOA member, why not take the time to join the club, so you can enjoy posting on the forum, the BMW Owners News magazine, and all of the discounts and benefits the BMW MOA offers?

This thread is going to be stale and unimaginative, don't look.

By my calculations, this thread averaged 3.273 posts per day between 7-31-2007 (when all this nothingenness started..........or is it ended............????????????????) and one year later 8-31-08. In the first six months it was 5.737 post per day...roughly.

Between 8-31-08 and today the average is 1.045. Obviously I have a lot to do in my life......

I believe we are doing exactly as required here. Decending in to nothingness........
 
By my calculations, this thread averaged 3.273 posts per day between 7-31-2007 (when all this nothingenness started..........or is it ended............????????????????) and one year later 8-31-08. In the first six months it was 5.737 post per day...roughly.

Between 8-31-08 and today the average is 1.045. Obviously I have a lot to do in my life......

I believe we are doing exactly as required here. Decending in to nothingness........
Facinatinlg boring statistic.:drink :whistle
 
Nothing More, Nothing Less

So, according to Moondog's calculations, we started out by producing a lot of nothing, but have now reached a point where our output of nothing has significantly decreased. Clearly, our Nothing Quotient (NQ) is in a state of decline. Is this a good thing or a bad thing?

If our ultimate goal is to reach perfect nothingness, then it would seem that a lot less of something (i.e., nothing) is superior to a lot more of the same. More or less . . .

:cat
 
So, according to Moondog's calculations, we started out by producing a lot of nothing, but have now reached a point where our output of nothing has significantly decreased. Clearly, our Nothing Quotient (NQ) is in a state of decline. Is this a good thing or a bad thing?

If our ultimate goal is to reach perfect nothingness, then it would seem that a lot less of something (i.e., nothing) is superior to a lot more of the same. More or less . . .

:cat

uh???????????
 
So, according to Moondog's calculations, we started out by producing a lot of nothing, but have now reached a point where our output of nothing has significantly decreased. Clearly, our Nothing Quotient (NQ) is in a state of decline. Is this a good thing or a bad thing?

If our ultimate goal is to reach perfect nothingness, then it would seem that a lot less of something (i.e., nothing) is superior to a lot more of the same. More or less . . .

:cat
But if you have more of the same, nothing, how can that be less if it is more. Or is it more of less of the same or less of more.
 
Back
Top