• Welcome, Guest! We hope you enjoy the excellent technical knowledge, event information and discussions that the BMW MOA forum provides. Some forum content will be hidden from you if you remain logged out. If you want to view all content, please click the 'Log in' button above and enter your BMW MOA username and password.

    If you are not an MOA member, why not take the time to join the club, so you can enjoy posting on the forum, the BMW Owners News magazine, and all of the discounts and benefits the BMW MOA offers?

  • Beginning April 1st, and running through April 30th, there is a new 2024 BMW MOA Election discussion area within The Club section of the forum. Within this forum area is also a sticky post that provides the ground rules for participating in the Election forum area. Also, the candidates statements are provided. Please read before joining the conversation, because the rules are very specific to maintain civility.

    The Election forum is here: Election Forum

Gel Battery Charger

globalrider

Alps Adventurer
I stopped in at my BMW dealer and checked on the part numbers of the voltage regulators used over the years on the R1150 GS.

The part number for the voltage regulator for a 2001 and 2003 GS model were the same.

So I would like to have BMW AG or BMW NA explain why all the black magic surrounding "their" special gel battery charger.

If the gel battery in my 2003 R1150 GS Adventure can be charged by the same charging system as a 2001 that employed a lead acid battery, what do I need a special BMW gel charger for?

As it stands now, they haven't proven their case, BMW Service Bulletin or not.
 
The part number for the voltage regulator for a 2001 and 2003 GS model were the same.


Yes, but what about the 2004 model with gel batteries regulators?

You pay your money -- or not -- and take your choice and accept any consequences.

Latest info is at the bottom of:

http://bmwmotorcycle.home.att.net/1150.htm
 
Jeff Dean said:
Yes, but what about the 2004 model with gel batteries regulators?

Jeff,

Do they have "gel battery regulators" installed in the alternators (I doubt it)? Did you check the part number of the regulator at the dealer?

I have a 2003 BMW R1150 GS Adventure that was manufactured in 04 (April) of 2003. It is a "2 spark" model with a "gel battery".

2004 models didn't come out till September of 2003. I don't care how BMW NA wants to label them. The date code on the manufacturer's sticker is what I go by. Just because they changed the head design to a "2 spark" mid year, doesn't call for a new model year designation. What would happen if we had 2 or 3 mid year design changes...call them 2006 models?

So back to the charger issue. I have the same charging system that a 2001 and 2002 GS had and that a 2004 model GS has (namely for an acid battery setup), so BMW has a bit of explaining to do.

Now I don't have a PhD in batteries; probably why I got 9 years out of my original GS battery and the car battery just surpassed the 13 year mark...and still going strong.

Why does the BMW charger take a battery through a "desulfation cycle" if my battery hasn't been subjected to that?

As for charging a battery while hooked up to the motorcycle, I've always been against that for various reasons and especially more so now that my latest buy has electronics up the kazoo. When I disconnect the battery on my GS Adv, I connect another battery in parallel to maintain my fault codes and other settings and then disconnect the battery that I want to charge. You cannot go wrong using that setup.

Unless BMW comes up with a very good explanation, I say their Service Bulletin is a bunch of you know what. I'd love to hear their explanation to my original question in the first post. Better yet, let them send me the full spec sheet for their gel battery charger, showing graphs, etc.
 
Batteries etc

I would like to add my 2 cts worth in this debate about BMW's chargers.:snore
The main difference between lead acids and gel batteries is the charging voltage. 14.4 volts is the maximum a gel can handle before it disintegrates internally and over a short period of time seizes to function :cry . A lead acid can handle higher charging voltages without too many problems although it would be wise to keep it less than 15,5 volts as too much heat will be generated with water evaporating out of the battery.
Sulfating of plates occurs when the battery voltage is drained too low and the charging system (alternator or 110V charger) is not up to the task. Well designed chargers charge in three stages. There is a bulk charge followed by a "topping off" charge and last stage is a "float /trickle" charge to maintain the battery without overcharging them.
The big difference is the voltage that comes from the charger into the battery. As mentioned before 14.4 V is the max for gels.
All I know is that on my boat I use gel batteries and the charger was designed for these batteries with the right voltage coming out of the charger I plug in the wall. The engines alternator puts out 14.4 volts and won't burn up the batteries either.
I don't know what voltages are involved in the BMW chargers for either type of battery, but it would be a good thing to compare the new and the old chargers to see if indeed they have been changed.:idea
 
Re: Batteries etc

rider1150RT said:
The main difference between lead acids and gel batteries is the charging voltage. 14.4 volts is the maximum a gel can handle before it disintegrates internally and over a short period of time seizes to function :cry . A lead acid can handle higher charging voltages without too many problems although it would be wise to keep it less than 15,5 volts as too much heat will be generated with water evaporating out of the battery.
Correct me if I am wrong, but don't all automatic chargers cut out at 14.4 volts or less (ie: 2.4 volts per cell). The only way I can see going beyond the 14.4 volts is when a manual charger is used.


rider1150RT said:
Sulfating of plates occurs when the battery voltage is drained too low...
That never happens if you charge a battery on a regular basis.

rider1150RT said:
I don't know what voltages are involved in the BMW chargers for either type of battery, but it would be a good thing to compare the new and the old chargers to see if indeed they have been changed.:idea
That would be a plan, but I'd still like to know why the charging system in my GS that was designed for lead acid batteries, is now also used to charge my factory gel cell. The voltage regulators, as mentioned, are the same.
 
One local dealer told me if you charge a gel battery over 14.4 volts, it builds up excessive internal pressure and then vents to the atmosphere through a safety valve. The result of this is that you reduce the life of the battery, because it now is NOT sealed.

Take it for what it is worth......

There was a similar disscussion on the Yankee Beemer messsage board a while back. I told them , that IMO, the alternator makes the best battery charger----- just use the bike.

YA DON'T NEED NO special charger!



Cheers,
Steve
 
BMW gel battery chargers are made by

BMW gel battery chargers, 72 60 1 470 156 and 99 99 0 005 656, are made by Deltran Battery Tender.

:brow
 
I have a 2000 RT, my battery died a couple of months ago and I replaed it with the BMW gel battery (supposedly the latest & greatest thing). Now that cool weather and home time projects make for less riding I wanted to put the bike on a charger. I began checking and have had much conflicting information. I was told my existing trickle charger could damage the battery and reduce life expectancy(of the battery). I was sold a battery tender plus by my local dealer, but the instructions offered conflicting info. I contacted my dealer again, who said to go ahead and use it. I then contacted the manufacturer of the battery tender plus and was told I needed to use the private label version that the dealer should have sold me. I spoke with one of their engineers and learned more about batteries than I wanted to know. However with the 2000 RT alternator and the Gel battery working okay and the discussion with the engineer and the lack of bacward compatability of the BMW version of th battery tender plus (it puts out a lower charging voltage per specs of the gel battery and may not adequately charge a regular lead acid battery) I have elected to use the standard battery tender plus and if I have a shortened battery life, I will consider it an expensive lesson and replace with a lead acid or maintenance free (wesco type) battery next time.

another thing about the gel battery is that if you were to leave your parking light on and run it completely down, the battery cannot be boost started.

knowing what I know now, I would not buy the gel battery.

Rocky Raccoon
 
I have retrofitted two pre-2004 BMWs with gel batteries. I would not have a lead-acid battery again. I am very glad to have the gel battery alternative.

I bought a Battery Tender gel-battery charger to charge them. The lesson is to get the correct charger for your battery.

I encourage anyone considering BMW's gel battery not to hesitate. Get it! And also get the correct charger for it.
 
Rocky Racoon said:
another thing about the gel battery is that if you were to leave your parking light on and run it completely down, the battery cannot be boost started.

knowing what I know now, I would not buy the gel battery.

My 2003 GS Adventure came with a gel battery.

I don't know what "added" benefit I will get from it. I don't intend to do any inverted flight or an outside loop with my GS Adventure.

Except for signs of slowing down during the last few months, the factory Mareg lead acid battery in my R100 GS lasted 9 years and never failed to start within that time period.:bliss
I wonder if my gel battery will last that long. I'm not against progress, but "real" progress is associated with "real" gains in my books.

As for BMW's gel battery charger service bulletin, I'm not buying it based on technical reasons that they've failed to clarify. My first post at the top of this thread pretty well sums it up.
 
Thanks for your input, both Jeff & Alex. As for the right charger, according to the engineer I spoke to, the fact that my alternator/voltage regulator is putting out a higher charging voltage, the "Incorrect" battery charger will do no more harm to the battery than my bike. Also the information that the engineer gave me is that engine start situations are much less critical than are what he referred to as "deep cycle" situations in which a battery is run from a completely charged state to a completely discharged or nearly discharged state each time it is used. He explained that in those types of situations without the appropriate charger that noticable battery degredation would soon become evident.

As for the gain/benefit of the gel (which was one of my primary reasons for getting it) if you have ever tried to check and or add distilled water to the battery in an R1100RT, not having to take off the left body panel and remove the battery is worth the extra expense.

I guess that when I think about it, I don't really regret buying the battery, (and so far - about two months - it is fine) the biggest issue has been the confusion about its care.

My primary ride till I got my RT was/is a 1976 R75/6 where simply lifting off the seat gave me access to the battery for filling and charging.

Today has been my first experience with the forum, I am pleased to have had replies so speedily and look forward to learning a great deal. With folks like you with such tremendous experience giving opinons and suggestions there will be a lot to consider.

Thanks

Rocky Racoon
 
charging battery on the bike

My question arises from what GlobalRider said about charging the battery while still connected to the bike. I have an 03 k1200 ltc with all the bells and whistles and I am now wondering if I should disconnect the battery to charge it. I don't know much about bmw cycles as this is my 1st one so (1) will I do damage to electrical components if Charging still hooked up (2) and if the battery tenders come with the bmw plug socket adapter then I am under the impression that is one of the ways it was designed to be used? I have just bought the new gel charger even though my battery is the old style ( the bmw dealer recommended to purchase that one over the old style charger) as the replacement battery will probably be the gel type when the time comes. If charging should be done with the battery unhooked -- I don't know what all that would effect upon reconnecting and trying to get going again (security, sensors, clock, computer etc.) I have already used the charger via the socket plug adapter so have I possibly done damage to my battery and electrical system? Any replys to the correct way to charge the k1200 ltc would be appreciated. This is the only time that I have charged the battery since I haven't ridden any distance in a couple of weeks here in Tennessee. Thanks Ya"ll
 
Rocky Racoon said:
Thanks for your input, both Jeff & Alex. As for the right charger, according to the engineer I spoke to, the fact that my alternator/voltage regulator is putting out a higher charging voltage, the "Incorrect" battery charger will do no more harm to the battery than my bike.
I don't see how. Whatever you are comfortable with. I love it when people make statements but don't provide anything to back them up with. I've been using the same 1 A manual battery charger for as long as I can remember and monitoring the battery voltage with a DMM. At that rate of charge, things only happen so fast, so you have plenty of time to disconnect the thing when necessary. I only recently got a battery tender type of charger to try one out.


Rocky Racoon said:
Also the information that the engineer gave me is that engine start situations are much less critical than are what he referred to as "deep cycle" situations in which a battery is run from a completely charged state to a completely discharged or nearly discharged state each time it is used.
A marine type battery used to power a trolling motor, for example. There are specific battery chargers for those types of batteries as well.

Rocky Racoon said:
As for the gain/benefit of the gel (which was one of my primary reasons for getting it) if you have ever tried to check and or add distilled water to the battery in an R1100RT, not having to take off the left body panel and remove the battery is worth the extra expense.
I only need to top my battery up during winter layaway and even then it only takes a slight amount of distilled water. That didn't occur to me for that reason.

Rocky Racoon said:
My primary ride till I got my RT was/is a 1976 R75/6 where simply lifting off the seat gave me access to the battery for filling and charging.
Ahhh, there is nothing like simplicity. I too just got one of then new fangled high tech wonders this past summer to see what all the fuss was about. No difference, at least in my experience, but it did give me the chance to park my favourite bikes (my airhead GSes) which I won't part with.
 
Re: charging battery on the bike

IRONHORSECOWBOY said:
My question arises from what GlobalRider said about charging the battery while still connected to the bike. I have an 03 k1200 ltc with all the bells and whistles and I am now wondering if I should disconnect the battery to charge it.
I charge my battery off bike only as a precautionary measure. To mainatin any fault codes in the Motronic computer, I hook up another battery in parallel and then disconnect the battery I want to charge. If the charger is working correctly and never fails, then it shouldn't be a problem.

I like your signature line. It reminds me of this road sign I've come across in Austria many times that states (translated) "Give Your Guardian Angel a Chance".
 
BATTERY INFO

Thanks to Kbasa and GlobalRider for your replies about the charging methods. Today I will be charging my battery on the bike since it is going to be about 60 degrees and SUNNY!! A good day to go out for some CHRISTMAS scootering up on the Ocoee River Gorge. I live about 30 miles from the beginning of the Great Smoky Mtns Natl Forest and it will be a good ride this time of year. The Deals Gap that all you R riders enjoy is only about 65 miles up 411 hwy or by crossing Cherohala Skyway about 85 miles, but today there will probably still be some ice or snow up at those elevations. Thanks again and see you down the road!
 
I plugged my battery tender plus into the accesory socket and it went into charge mode (red lighth on). A few hours laters it showed the battery about 80 percent (red light on and green light flashing) and awhile after that it showed fully charged (green light on steady) This is what the dealer suggested. Disconnecting the battery on an R100RT is a pain in the patoot as far as I can tell. I suppose some auxillary connectors could be added to allows some kind of quick disonnect from the battery to put the charger on. However I don't have a spare battery to connect to keep all the auxiliary stuff running. I don't know other than the clock on my bike what really needs to stay powered up.

This has been an interesting problem. Kind of reminds me of back in the 80's on my old airhead with the question of unleaded versus leaded (when leaded went away) and whether dual plugging was the fix. I didn't dual plug and my old R75/6 still runs pretty darn good on unleaded premium.

I hope to ride some tomorrow and don't anticpate any battery problems

Rocky
 
Pardon the late post on this thread, but I just recently joined this forum.

Gel and AGM (Absorbed Glass Mat) are two types of VRLA (Valve Regulated Lead Acid) battery. Until recently, no motorcycle has ever had a Gel battery in it, though the two terms are mistakenly used by a lot of us as if they referred to the same thing. Those maintenance-free sealed batteries from Westco, Deka, Yuasa, Champion, etc are all AGM.

Seeing this thread prompted me to consult with a friend of mine who's a product engineer at Yuasa; here's his response. I hope y'all find it useful.

Stu,
Good question. Perhaps you can help enlighten the motorcycling community RE the differences between 'AGM' and 'Gel'.

BMW Motorcycle group has begun to supply a Gel type battery in their MY03 vehicles. This decision was based on reports of lower self-discharge rates than AGM designs. They feel this will address the typical seasonal use and extended storage periods that are detrimental to the battery. The Gel battery is produced by Exide in their Portugal facility and is offered in three DIN types. 51814(18Ah), 51913(19Ah) and 52015(20Ah)

Gel Cell batteries and AGM batteries offer an advantage over conventional batteries since they are both sealed VRLA and non-spillable. Gel Cell designs are typically manufactured using inexpensive separators made of polyethylene or glass leaf. AGM batteries require the use of a more costly spun or woven glass fiber separator, which absorbs the electrolyte. The electrolyte in the gel battery is blended with a form of silica, which results in a thick ÔÇØtoothpasteÔÇØ like consistency.
Gel Cell designs typically have been specified for cycling applications due to their ability to recover well from deep discharge. The Gel electrolyte retains a high percentage of sulfuric acid (approx. 15%) following the complete discharge cycle of the battery. This percentage of acid helps facilitate quick charge acceptance upon recharge and also prevents the development of hydration or dendritic shorts from forming. Also, since the sulfuric acid is suspended in the Gel electrolyte uniformly against the plate surfaces, the entire plate surface accepts the charge immediately. Both conventional and AGM can be susceptible to stratification of the electrolyte with the upper portion of the battery having a lower percentage of sulfuric acid than the bottom portion. This results in less efficient charge acceptance.

While the Gel Cell battery offers some advantages, there are also some disadvantages. The high percentage of sulfuric acid retained in the electrolyte following complete discharge limits the overall electrical capacity of the battery as compared to AGM or conventional. This reduction in energy density can be a problem in many applications with high electrical demands and limited installation area. Charging voltage also must be controlled and most manufactures recommend a maximum of 14.4v @ 25 deg. C. Many vehicles and battery chargers exceed this voltage. Exceeding the charge voltage can result in thermal damage, which can reduce the Gel electrolyte into a liquid state and result in permanent damage to the battery.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top